Why the study?
Does an SVM-based channel selection method improve the classification accuracy of fNIRS hemodynamic data between children with ADHD and ASD?
Does an SVM-based channel selection method improve the classification accuracy of fNIRS hemodynamic data between children with ADHD and ASD?
An SVM-based method can identify optimal subsets of fNIRS channels to improve classification accuracy between children with ADHD and ASD.
SVM channel optimization may enhance fNIRS differentiation of pediatric ADHD from ASD; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before any clinical role.
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in psychiatric studies has widely demonstrated that cerebral hemodynamics differs among psychiatric patients. Recently we found that children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) showed different hemodynamic responses to their own mother's face. Based on this finding, we may be able to classify the hemodynamic data into two those groups and predict to which diagnostic group an unknown participant belongs. In the present study, we proposed a novel statistical method for classifying the hemodynamic data of these two groups. By applying a support vector machine (SVM), we searched the combination of measurement channels at which the hemodynamic response differed between the ADHD and the ASD children. The SVM found the optimal subset of channels in each data set and successfully classified the ADHD data from the ASD data. For the 24-dimensional hemodynamic data, two optimal subsets classified the hemodynamic data with 84% classification accuracy, while the subset contained all 24 channels classified with 62% classification accuracy. These results indicate the potential application of our novel method for classifying the hemodynamic data into two groups and revealing the combinations of channels that efficiently differentiate the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichikawa et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: