Diagnostic study demonstrates accurate machine learning classification of ADHD in children using EEG signals, highlighting frontal executive network biomarkers.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder whose clinical assessment relies mainly on behavioral and neuropsychological evaluation. This study evaluates a subject-wise machine learning framework for distinguishing children with ADHD from healthy controls using multichannel EEG-derived features. The public dataset comprised 121 participants (61 ADHD and 60 controls), with 19-channel EEG recordings sampled at 128 Hz. Signals were segmented into 4-s windows with 50% overlap, and statistical and spectral features were extracted, including mean, standard deviation, and theta-, alpha-, and beta-band power. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Logistic Regression (LR) were evaluated using strict subject-wise separation. RF achieved the highest Accuracy (0.8099), F1-score (0.8160), Balanced Accuracy (0.8097), and MCC (0.6204), whereas SVM obtained the highest Sensitivity (0.8525) and ROC-AUC (0.8527). An additional subject-specific analysis based on individual alpha frequency (IAF) was performed to account for inter-individual spectral variability; mean IAF values were 8.8320 Hz for ADHD and 8.8833 Hz for controls, and the individualized-band analysis did not improve classification performance. Bootstrap confidence intervals and non-parametric tests indicated comparable performance among RF, SVM, and GB. Frontal and fronto-central channels, particularly Fz, showed the greatest model-derived contribution. Overall, the framework provides a reproducible subject-wise EEG classification approach, although external validation on independent cohorts remains necessary before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jácome et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: