Why the study?
As surgery in aged patients increases, their perioperative safety, effectiveness, and quality of life face major challenges, requiring standardized perioperative assessment and decision-making.
Does the APPLE-MDT path improve surgical decision-making and outcomes in aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery?
Does the APPLE-MDT path improve surgical decision-making and outcomes in aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery?
This protocol outlines a study to evaluate a multidisciplinary perioperative evaluation and decision-making system for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery.
Protocol for multidisciplinary perioperative evaluation in elderly elective surgery patients; leaves open effects on decision-making and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: With the extended life expectancy of the Chinese population and improvements in surgery and anesthesia techniques, the number of aged patients undergoing surgery has been increasing annually. However, safety, effectiveness, and quality of life of aged patients undergoing surgery are facing major challenges. In order to standardize the perioperative assessment and procedures, we have developed a perioperative evaluation and auxiliary decision-making system named "Aged Patient Perioperative Longitudinal Evaluation-Multidisciplinary Trial (APPLE-MDT)". METHODS: We will conduct a perioperative risk evaluation and targeted intervention, with follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the "Aged Patient Perioperative Longitudinal Evaluation-Multiple Disciplinary Trial Path" (hereinafter referred to as the APPLE-MDT path) in surgical decision-making for aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery under non-local anesthesia in the operating room. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the postoperative outcome and health economics of the APPLE-MDT path applied to the surgical decision-making of aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery under non-local anesthesia and to optimize intervention strategies for aged patients undergoing surgery to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and improve the quality of life after surgery. DISCUSSION: It is necessary to formulate a reliable, effective, and concise evaluation tool, which can effectively predict the perioperative complications and mortality of aged patients, support targeted intervention strategies, and allow for a more comprehensive risk and benefit analysis, thereby forming an effective senile perioperative surgery management path. It is expected that the implementation of this protocol can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, improve the postoperative quality of life, shorten hospital stay, reduce hospitalization expenses, reduce social burden, and allow the elderly to have a good quality of life after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800020363 , Registered 15 December 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: