Why the study?
The role of brain natriuretic peptides in detecting fluid status abnormalities is debated, with conflicting data regarding the relationship between volume status and BNPs in dialysis patients.
Is NT-proBNP a reliable marker for body fluid status and cardiovascular risk in children with chronic kidney disease?
Is NT-proBNP a reliable marker for body fluid status and cardiovascular risk in children with chronic kidney disease?
NT-proBNP correlates with fluid overload and left ventricular dysfunction in children with chronic kidney disease, suggesting its utility for early cardiovascular risk assessment.
INTRODUCTION: Brain natriuretic peptides, released in response to left ventricular stress, have a strong prognostic value in dialysis patients. However, their role in detecting abnormalities of fluid status is under debate; the relationship between volume status and brain natriuretic peptides (BNPs) differs among various studies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of N-terminal proBNP in the assessment of fluid status and cardiovascular risk in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 65 children: 10 pre-dialysis, 13 hemodialysis, 12 peritoneal dialysis patients and 30 healthy controls. Volume status was determined by multifrequency bioimpedance and NT-pro-BNP, as well as echocardiography to estimate the left ventricle structure and function. CONCLUSIONS: Our research suggested that NT-proBNP, which was correlated with LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction and fluid overload as assessed by bioimpedance, can be used to evaluate cardiovascular states in a chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. From the early stages of CKD, periodic monitoring of NT-proBNP levels may be essential for early detection of patients with high risk of cardiovascular events, and for taking preventive intervention as soon as possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nalçacıoğlu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: