Why the study?
Does cryoablation prevent tachycardia recurrence in pediatric patients with presumed AVNRT?
Does cryoablation prevent tachycardia recurrence in pediatric patients with presumed AVNRT?
Cryoablation is a feasible and safe alternative for treating presumed AVNRT in pediatric patients, though it carries a 23% recurrence rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cryoablation may be feasible for presumed pediatric AVNRT with conduction changes; leaves open long-term efficacy in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Little data exist on the outcomes of cryoablation for the treatment of presumptive atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in a pediatric population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing cryoablation from January 2006 to October 2010 for presumed AVNRT at the Children's Hospital Colorado. Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 18, normal heart structure, no prior ablation procedures, documented narrow complex tachycardia, and no inducible tachycardia or other tachycardia mechanisms during electrophysiology study. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent cryoablation for presumed AVNRT. Cryoablation catheter tip size varied from 4 to 8 mm with a median of eight cryoablation lesions. Isoproterenol was utilized preablation in 54% and none postablation. Procedural endpoints, per written report, were loss of sustained slow pathway, change in Wenckebach cycle length, and no specific endpoint. Procedural endpoints, per measured data, were a decrease in patients exhibiting sustained slow pathway conduction. Maximum atrial-His (AH) interval with atrial overdrive pacing was reduced from 266 ms preablation to 167 ms postablation, p = 0.006. The number of patients with an AH jump was reduced from 6 to 2. After follow-up of 13.8 ± 14.3 months, 23% (3/13) had documented tachycardia recurrence. No statistical significance was determined when comparing electrophysiology testing parameters pre- and postablation among the group with recurrence versus the group without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation can be considered as a safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of presumed AVNRT among pediatric patients, albeit with a recurrence rate of 23%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
VILLASENOR et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: