Why the study?
What is the role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients?
What is the role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients?
Echocardiography is a crucial tool for the noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation and optimization of critically ill patients, though its intermittent nature often requires combination with continuous monitoring devices.
May support echocardiography for hemodynamic optimization in sepsis and ventilation; leaves open outcome impact in prospective trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the role of echocardiography for the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to its crucial role in evaluating heart abnormalities as in the classical cardiological approach, echocardiography is now frequently used by intensivists for noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of the critically ill patient. Using echocardiography, it is possible to measure cardiac output, intravascular pressures and volumes, systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles, and preload responsiveness. This not only allows characterization of the precise nature of hemodynamic alterations in patients with circulatory and respiratory failure, but also provides guidance for hemodynamic optimization and optimization of ventilatory settings. There are now many data showing how echocardiography can be useful in detecting otherwise unrecognized myocardial depression in sepsis and right ventricular dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients. The main limitation of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring is its intermittent nature. Hence, echocardiography is often combined with other monitoring devices, allowing continuous measurement of flow and triggering new echocardiographic evaluations. SUMMARY: Echocardiography has now become an important tool for hemodynamic evaluation of the critically ill patient. Echocardiography should be performed in most patients with circulatory and respiratory failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel De Backer (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: