Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Excess molar heat capacities, CEp, throughout the entire concentration range have been determined at 25 °C for the following oxaalkane–alkane systems: 2,5,8,11,14-pentaoxapentadecane (tetraglyme) with decane, nonane, octane and hexane; 2,5,8,11-tetraoxadodecane (triglyme) with hexadecane, pentadecane, tetradecane, dodecane, decane and hexane; 2,5,8-trioxanonane (diglyme) with 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyltetracosane (squalane), 2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane (pristane), hexadecane and decane; 2,5-dioxahexane (monoglyme) with squalane, pristane, decane and heptane; and 1,4-dioxacyclohexane (p-dioxane) with cyclohexane. For all these tures CEp has a W-shaped concentration dependence (two minima separated by a maximum). By increasing the molecular size of either component, the maximum in CEp is enhanced and displaced towards high concentrations of the smaller component. CEp behaviour correlates with degrees of non-randomness in the mixtures as quantified by the concentration–concentration correlation function Scc which is calculated using the Flory–Huggins theory with a group-interaction model and assuming interaction between molecular surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trejo et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: