Why the study?
Continuous systemic blood pressure monitoring requires invasive or advanced modalities, creating a barrier to obtaining vital circulatory information during general anaesthesia induction.
Does the Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) discriminate haemodynamic responses to induction of general anaesthesia in surgical patients?
Does the Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) discriminate haemodynamic responses to induction of general anaesthesia in surgical patients?
The Peripheral Perfusion Index can serve as a simple, non-invasive indicator of the degree of haemodynamic changes following the induction of general anaesthesia.
PPI may flag early perfusion shifts during induction; leaves open whether it improves hypotension management or outcomes.
Induction of general anaesthesia is often accompanied by hypotension. Standard haemodynamic monitoring during anaesthesia relies on intermittent blood pressure and heart rate. Continuous monitoring systemic blood pressure requires invasive or advanced modalities creating a barrier for obtaining important information of the circulation. The Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) is obtained non-invasively and continuously by standard photoplethysmography. We hypothesized that different patterns of changes in systemic haemodynamics during induction of general anaesthesia would be reflected in the PPI. Continuous values of PPI, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were evaluated in 107 patients by either minimally invasive or non-invasive means in a mixed population of surgical patients. 2 min after induction of general anaesthesia relative changes of SV, CO, and MAP was compared to the relative changes of PPI. After induction total cohort mean(± st.dev.) MAP, SV, and CO decreased to 65(± 16)%, 74(± 18)%, and 63(± 16)% of baseline values. In the 38 patients where PPI decreased MAP was 57(± 14)%, SV was 63(± 18)%, and CO was 55(± 18)% of baseline values 2 min after induction. In the 69 patients where PPI increased the corresponding values were MAP 70(± 15)%, SV 80(± 16)%, and CO 68(± 17)% (all differences: p < 0,001). During induction of general anaesthesia changes in PPI discriminated between the degrees of reduction in blood pressure and algorithm derived cardiac stroke volume and -output. As such, the PPI has potential to be a simple and non-invasive indicator of the degree of post-induction haemodynamic changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Højlund et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: