Why the study?
Does three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) accurately measure cardiac output compared to thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) accurately measure cardiac output compared to thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Intraoperative 3DTEE is feasible for measuring cardiac output and correlates well with thermodilution, although it has significant bias and wide limits of agreement.
3DTEE cardiac output estimates warrant caution in cardiac surgery due to wide limits of agreement; leaves open its role as a noninvasive alternative pending prospective validation.
In Brief BACKGROUND: In this pilot study, we attempted to validate three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) cardiac output and assess its feasibility intraoperatively. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing cardiac surgery underwent simultaneous cardiac output determinations during the clinically stable prebypass period by 3DTEE and thermodilution. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between cardiac output measured by the two methods was 0.86. The 3DTEE mean bias was 0.27 L/min, limits of agreement −1.64 to 2.17 L/min (approximately ±35%). Three-dimensional data acquisition averaged 43 s; postprocessing took 7 min. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional TEE can measure cardiac output and is feasible perioperatively. Measurements have good correlation with thermodilution, though with a significant bias and wide limits of agreement. IMPLICATIONS: This pilot study attempted to validate three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography cardiac output and assess its feasibility intraoperatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Culp et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: