Why the study?
Cold-induced vasodilation protects against frostbite in able-bodied individuals, but whether it occurs in sensate and non-sensate areas in spinal cord injuries was unknown.
Does local cooling induce cold-induced vasodilation in sensate and non-sensate areas in persons with spinal cord injuries?
Does local cooling induce cold-induced vasodilation in sensate and non-sensate areas in persons with spinal cord injuries?
Cold-induced vasodilation, a local protective mechanism against frostbite, remains functional in both sensate and non-sensate areas of individuals with spinal cord injuries.
Supports functional cold-induced vasodilation in non-sensate skin after spinal cord injury; leaves open effects on frostbite risk.
Study Design : Acute experimental study Objectives : Cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD) is a local mechanism of protection against frostbite in able-body persons. This study assessed whether CIVD was observed in the sensate and non-sensate area in spinal cord injuries (SCIs) and whether the response patterns were different between the region levels or sites. Setting : Laboratory of Wakayama Medical University, Japan Methods : A local cooler device (diameter 4 cm) was placed on the chest (sensate) and thigh (non-sensate) in persons with cervical (SCI C ; n=9) and thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries (SCI TL ; n=9). After the surface temperature was controlled at 33°C for 10 min (baseline), local cooling (LC) with a rate of 0.045°C/s was applied and the temperature was maintained at 15 and 8°C for 15 min of each stage. Skin blood flow (SkBF; laser Doppler flowmetry) was monitored using a 1-mm needle-type probe inserted into its center. CIVD was observed on the both sites in all participants at 8°C LC. Results : % change in SkBF (%ΔSkBF) on the chest remained unchanged until the end of the 15°C stage in both groups, then it increased at 8°C stage over the baseline. %ΔSkBF on the thigh remained unchanged throughout the measurement in SCI C , but decreased during the periods from 33 to 15°C and from 15 to 8°C, then recovered to around the baseline level at 8°C in SCI TL . Conclusions : CIVD was observed both in the sensate and non-sensate areas in SCIs. The magnitudes of the response were different between the both areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamijo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: