PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2021Diversity and Distributions161 citationsOpen Access

GAPeDNA: Assessing and mapping global species gaps in genetic databases for eDNA metabarcoding

View Full Paper
VMVirginie MarquesSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape ResearchTMTristan MilhauCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCACamille AlbouySwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Aim Environmental DNA metabarcoding has recently emerged as a non‐invasive tool for aquatic biodiversity inventories, frequently surpassing traditional methods for detecting a wide range of taxa in most habitats. The major limitation currently impairing the large‐scale application of eDNA‐based inventories is the lack of species sequences available in public genetic databases. Unfortunately, these gaps are still unknown spatially and taxonomically, hindering targeted future sequencing efforts. Innovation We propose GAPeDNA, a user‐friendly web interface that provides a global overview of genetic database completeness for a given taxon across space and conservation status. As an application, we synthetized data from regional checklists for marine and freshwater fishes along with their IUCN conservation status to provide global maps of species coverage using the European Nucleotide Archive public reference database for 19 metabarcoding primers. This tool automatizes the scanning of gaps in these databases to guide future sequencing efforts and support the deployment of eDNA inventories at larger scale. This tool is flexible and can be expanded to other taxa and primers upon data availability. Main conclusions Using our global fish case study, we show that gaps increase towards the tropics where species diversity and the number of threatened species are the highest. It highlights priority areas for fish sequencing like the Congo, the Mekong and the Mississippi freshwater basins which host more than 60 non‐sequenced threatened fish species. For marine fishes, the Caribbean and East Africa host up to 42 non‐sequenced threatened species. By presenting the global genetic database completeness for several primers on any taxa and building an open‐access, updatable and flexible tool, GAPeDNA appears as a valuable contribution to support any kind of eDNA metabarcoding study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marques et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83f6e74d653d38678deb43https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions2005 · 1,567 citations
  2. 2Global fishing effort (1950–2010): Trends, gaps, and implications2010 · 309 citations
  3. 3Worst case scenario: potential long-term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-reef communities2011 · 361 citations
  4. 4Demographic dynamics of the smallest marine vertebrates fuel coral reef ecosystem functioning2019 · 238 citations
  5. 5Towards robust and repeatable sampling methods in eDNA ‐based studies2018 · 213 citations