Why the study?
Does MRI T2 change correlate with 18F-FDG uptake for quantifying muscle activation following resistance exercise in healthy men?
Does MRI T2 change correlate with 18F-FDG uptake for quantifying muscle activation following resistance exercise in healthy men?
Changes in muscle T2 on MRI strongly correlate with 18F-FDG uptake on PET, suggesting T2 may serve as a surrogate marker for glucose uptake in muscle activation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support T2 MRI as FDG surrogate for muscle activation; leaves open validation in patients before clinical use.
The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between relative glucose uptake and MRI T 2 changes in skeletal muscles following resistance exercise using simultaneous PET/MRI scans. Ten young healthy recreationally active men (age 21 – 28 years) were injected with 18F-FDG while activating the quadriceps of one leg with repeated knee extension exercises followed by hand-grip exercises for one arm. Immediately following the exercises, the subjects were scanned simultaneously with 18F-FDG PET/MRI and muscle groups were evaluated for increases in 18F-FDG uptake and MRI T 2 values. A significant linear correlation between 18F-FDG uptake and changes in muscle T 2 (R 2 = 0.71) was found. for both small and large muscles and in voxel to voxel comparisons. Despite large intersubject differences in muscle recruitment, the linear correlation between 18F-FDG uptake and changes in muscle T 2 did not vary among subjects. This is the first assessment of skeletal muscle activation using hybrid PET/MRI and the first study to demonstrate a high correlation between 18F-FDG uptake and changes in muscle T 2 with physical exercise. Accordingly, it seems that changes in muscle T 2 may be used as a surrogate marker for glucose uptake and lead to an improved insight into the metabolic changes that occur with muscle activation. Such knowledge may lead to improved treatment strategies in patients with neuromuscular pathologies such as stroke, spinal cord injuries and muscular dystrophies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haddock et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: