Why the study?
Alveolar soft-part sarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma subtype occurring mainly in young people with poor prognosis, prompting analysis of treatment and prognosis.
What are the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes for patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma?
What are the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes for patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma?
In patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma, postoperative adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve local control in localized disease, but targeted and immunosuppressive therapies offer better disease control than conventional chemotherapy in metastatic cases.
May support targeted or combined immunosuppressive therapy over chemotherapy in metastatic cases; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma subtype, occurring mainly in young people, with poor prognosis.Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of localized or metastatic ASPS patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (China) from 2012 to 2020, focusing on treatment and prognosis.Results The median age at diagnosis was 24 years (range: 1.4–78 years). Women (n = 29, 58%), especially those aged <30 years, dominated this series. The most common metastasis site was lung. Thirty-one (62%) patients developed lung metastasis (localized: n = 9 [18%]; metastatic: n = 22 [44%]). Only a tumor maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm was associated with a high lung metastasis rate (p = 0.039). The mean follow-up time was 37.5 months (1–108 months), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84.7%. Univariate analysis indicated that distant metastasis observed at the initial visit and incomplete resection of the primary tumor were associated with poor OS. For localized cases, neither surgery plus radiotherapy (p = 0.486) nor surgery plus chemotherapy (p = 0.536) improved progression-free survival compared to surgery alone. Among the metastatic cases, the disease control rate (PR + SD) was higher for targeted therapy (60%) and combined immunosuppressive therapy (100%) than for conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (26%).Conclusions Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy do not provide good local control for patients with localized disease. Although there is no standard treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, they can benefit from targeted therapy and/or immunosuppressive therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: