Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The elastic constants of classical systems of 108 particles arranged (with periodic boundary conditions) on an fcc lattice and interacting with pairwise-additive forces have been evaluated to an accuracy of about 2% by a Monte Carlo procedure closely related to that used by Hoover and his co-workers. For Ar(80 ^∘{}K) and Kr(85 and 115 ^∘{}K) we have used the Bobetic-Barker pair potentials and also included the corrections for the truncated tail of the pair potential, quantum effects, and three-body forces. For Ar(80 ^∘{}K) and Xe(156 ^∘{}K) we have carried out a similar calculation for the familiar Lennard-Jones 6:12 potential. Our 6:12 Ar(80 ^∘{}K) elastic constants agree well with the previous work of Hoover et al. but unfortunately differ only little from the more realistic Bobetic-Barker Ar(80 ^∘{}K) values. Bulk moduli for both potentials are compatible with the currently available experimental data. Comparison of our Kr results with experimental data indicates a need for refinement of the Bobetic-Barker Kr potential. The Xe(156 ^∘{}K) results agree very well with the recent Brillouin-scattering work of Gornall and Stoicheff which is to some extent disappointing because the same 6:12 potential is in poor agreement with the low-temperature heat capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: