For pt.I see ibid., vol.18, p.3919 (1985). The authors calculate wall and wall crossing energies numerically as a function of V G , the modulation of the substrate potential, at T=0. The wall energy is negative if V G <or=11K. The wall profile does not agree with that predicted by the analytic theory, because of anharmonicity in the Kr-Kr interaction. Wall crossing energies have function of V G as wall energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: