The present analysis provides Tb(0.27−0.30)Dy(0.73−0.70)Fe(1.9−2.0) magnetization and magnetostriction states during applied magnetic field and stress processes by minimizing the total magnetic free energy in the presence of a parameter selected inverse exponential magnetic free energy distribution. A comparison between experimental and model results shows that the model provides a qualitatively accurate description of the magnetostriction and magnetization in Tb(0.27−0.30)Dy(0.73−0.70)Fe(1.9−2.0) during applied magnetic field processes for a range of constant uniaxial applied stresses. Therefore, the model appears to be a useful tool for the analysis of Tb(0.27−0.30)Dy(0.73−0.70)Fe(1.9−2.0) applications with constant stress or strain dependent stress states. Furthermore, the good qualitative agreement between model and experiment supports the contention that the magnetostriction and magnetization response of Tb(0.27−0.30)Dy(0.73−0.70)Fe(1.9−2.0) is influenced by a defect induced defocusing of local magnetization direction about the average magnetization direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William D. Armstrong (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: