Why the study?
Some studies suggest patients with T2DM and obesity have better clinical outcomes than normal-weight patients, prompting evaluation of obesity, CVD events, and mortality in elderly patients with T2DM without CVD.
Does obesity measured by BMI or waist circumference predict the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death in elderly patients with T2DM without preexisting CVD?
Does obesity measured by BMI or waist circumference predict the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death in elderly patients with T2DM without preexisting CVD?
In elderly patients with T2DM, waist circumference is a more suitable indicator of cardiovascular risk than BMI, as high BMI demonstrated a paradoxical protective association while high waist circumference was associated with increased risk.
Waist circumference may better stratify CV risk than BMI in elderly T2DM; leaves open prospective validation before guiding practice.
CONTEXT: Some studies have suggested that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) concomitant with obesity have better clinical outcomes than normal-weight patients with T2DM. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated associations among obesity, cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, and mortality in elderly patients with T2DM without CVD. METHODS: This retrospective observational study from 2009 to 2017, with a mean follow-up of 7.26 years, included 249 903 elderly (≥ 65 years) patients with T2DM and no preexisting CVD from the Korean National Health Information Database. We categorized subjects according to body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) and analyzed a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for baseline covariates. RESULTS: The incidence rate of composite primary outcomes was 30.95/1000 person-years. The primary outcome risk had an L-shaped and a U-shaped association with BMI and WC, respectively. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, the risk of primary composite outcomes in the highest BMI group (≥ 30 kg/m2; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.824; 95% CI, 0.794-0.855) was lower than in the normal BMI group (≥ 18.5 and < 23 kg/m2). Conversely, that in the highest WC group (≥ 100 cm/≥ 95 cm; men/women; HR = 1.434; 95% CI, 1.384-1.486) was higher than in the normal WC group (< 90 cm/< 85 cm; men/women). CONCLUSION: Our study with elderly patients with diabetes results suggest that while BMI is an inadequate risk indicator for outcomes related to obesity, WC is a suitable alternative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: