Why the study?
Does ST-segment depression resolution <50% predict worse outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Does ST-segment depression resolution <50% predict worse outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, failure to resolve ST depression by at least 50% provides independent prognostic value for 90-day mortality and heart failure outcomes, incremental to ST elevation resolution.
STD-R <50% may aid post-PCI risk stratification in STEMI; extends STE-R data but leaves open prospective validation.
AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic impact of ST depression resolution among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI in the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, 4729 of 5745 patients had analysable ECGs demonstrating concomitant ST-segment depression. Resolution of summation operatorST elevation (STE-R) and summation operatorST depression (STD-R) on 30 min post-PCI ECGs was dichotomized into those with > or =50 vs. <50% ST-segment resolution. Overall, 1143 patients (24%) had STD-R<50%. These patients had higher risk characteristics including older age, female sex, diabetes, hypertension, prior CHF/MI, Killip class >I, triple vessel disease, and less frequent TIMI 3 flow in the culprit coronary vessel post-PCI. After multivariable adjustment and accounting for STE-R, STD-R<50% remained an independent predictor for 90 day death and the composite of death, cardiogenic shock, or CHF. When compared with patients with both STE-R and STD-R> or =50%, patients with both STE-R and STD-R<50% had the worst outcomes [hazard ratios (HR) 90 day death: 2.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.71-3.77; HR 90 day composite: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.63-2.91]. CONCLUSION: When ST depression is present in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, STD-R<50% provides independent prognostic value that is incremental to STE-R.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tjandrawidjaja et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: