Why the study?
Arrhythmic burden below 26% has reduced predictive power for PVC-induced tachycardiomyopathy, prompting evaluation of a composite index incorporating PVC burden, duration, and coupling interval.
Does a composite index including PVC burden, duration, and coupling interval improve the prediction of PVC-induced tachycardiomyopathy compared to PVC burden alone in patients with frequent PVCs?
Does a composite index including PVC burden, duration, and coupling interval improve the prediction of PVC-induced tachycardiomyopathy compared to PVC burden alone in patients with frequent PVCs?
A composite index incorporating PVC burden, duration, and coupling interval offers superior sensitivity for predicting PVC-induced tachycardiomyopathy in patients with intermediate arrhythmic burden compared to PVC burden alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve tCMP prediction over PVC burden alone at intermediate loads; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
Aims – Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) may induce/aggravate LV systolic dysfunction (LVD) by tachy(dyssynchrono)cardiomyopathy (tCMP) in patients with/without previous structural heart disease. High arrhythmic burden (i.e. >26%) is the main predictor of tCMP development in patients with previously normal LV function. However, its predictive power is reduced once the arrhythmic burden is below 26%, with considerable overlap between patients at risk for tCMP and those who will maintain normal LV function. We sought to evaluate the predictive power of a composite index that includes PVC burden, PVC duration and PVC coupling interval. Methods – 61 patients referred for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with frequent PVCs refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD), symptomatic and/or with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) were retrospectively studied. Patients with structural lesions on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and/or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (c-MRI), with sustained ventricular tachycardia/supraventricular tachycardia or severe valvular disease were excluded. A composite parameter dependent on PVC burden, PVC duration and PVC coupling interval was defi ned. Results – Mean PVC burden was 25.80% ± 11.64 (35% ± 8.16 in tCMP subgroup). Chronic PVC suppression was achieved in 89.6% of patients with a mean of 1.44 ± 0.7 procedures with 86.4% of patients requiring one procedure. Septal right ventricular outfl ow tract (RVOT) was the most frequent PVC origin (36.1%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the tCMP group (7 patients) was 38% ± 5.26 which increased 1 month after RF ablation to 54.6% ± 3.64 (87.35% of recovered LVEF), at 3 months to 56% ± 2.23 and at 6 months 57% ± 2.73. LVEF recovery was also present in non-tCMP subgroup, yet statistically insignifi cant. There was no procedure-related mortality. Retrograde ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction, male gender, non-sustained VT (NSVT), a higher BMI and a higher PVC burden were associated with tCMP development. ROC curve analysis appears to demonstrate higher sensitivity of tCMP prediction by the composite index in comparison to PVC burden in patients with 16.93-25.93% PVCs (i.e. below the formerly described tCMP PVC% cut-off). Conclusions – In patients with a PVC burden lower than the previously described cut offs (i.e. with ~17-25% PVCs) PVC mediated systolic dysfunction seems to be predicted with higher sensitivity by a composite index accounting for PVC burden, PVC duration and PVC coupling interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cojocaru et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: