Key result
Among patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy undergoing catheter ablation, PVC origin in the right ventricle was significantly associated with a lack of ejection fraction recovery (OR 0.050).
Why the study?
Frequent premature ventricular contractions can induce cardiomyopathy, and the study sought to use cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to quantify changes in cardiac structure and function following PVC catheter ablation.
Do baseline cardiac MRI structural and functional parameters predict left ventricular ejection fraction recovery following PVC catheter ablation in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=51)
No
Do baseline cardiac MRI structural and functional parameters predict left ventricular ejection fraction recovery following PVC catheter ablation in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy?
Odds Ratio: 0.05
p-value: p=0.03
In patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, baseline CMR findings including scar burden and global longitudinal strain do not predict LVEF recovery after ablation, but RV origin of PVCs is associated with persistently reduced LVEF.
RV-origin PVCs may limit post-ablation EF recovery; leaves open prospective validation before guiding ablation decisions.
Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) can induce cardiomyopathy (PVC CM). We sought to use cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to quantify changes in cardiac structure and function of cardiomyopathy patients following catheter ablation for PVCs. Patients undergoing PVC ablation at the Johns Hopkins Hospital with pre-procedural CMR from 2010 to 2018 were included in this study. CMR Images were analyzed to collect information on cardiac structure and function as well as to quantify scar. Of the total 51 included patients, PVC CM (LVEF < 45%) was observed in 51% (n = 29). Of these, 19 had post-ablation ejection fractions quantified, with 78.9% (n = 15) recovering function. Global longitudinal strain was significantly correlated with LVEF (OR 1.831, p < 0.01) but did not predict recovery of function. RV origin of PVCs was more common in the preserved LVEF group but was also significantly correlated with persistently reduced EF post-ablation in the PVC CM group. Scar burden was not correlated with either cardiac function or post-ablation recovery of function. In this cohort, there were no significant CMR findings to predict subsequent recovery of EF after ablation among those with PVC CM. PVC origin in the RV was associated with persistently reduced LVEF after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy (n=51). Right ventricular origin of PVC vs. Left ventricular origin of PVC was evaluated on Recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (>10% improvement) after ablation (OR 0.050, p=0.03). Among patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy undergoing catheter ablation, PVC origin in the right ventricle was significantly associated with a lack of ejection fraction recovery (OR 0.050).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: