Equipment plasma has been modeled semi-empirically using neural networks in conjunction with statistical experimental design. A 3/sup 3/ factorial design was employed to characterize the plasma, in which the variables that were varied include a source power, pressure, and Ar flow rate. As a test data for model validation, 16 experiments were additionally conducted. A total of six plasma attributes were modeled, which include electron density, electron temperature, and plasma potential as well as their spatial uniformities. A planar, inductively coupled plasma was generated in a multipole plasma etch equipment and Langmuir probe was utilized for data collection. Root mean-squared prediction errors measured on the test data are 0.323 (10/sup 11//cm/sup 3/), 0.267 (eV) and 1.141 (V) for electron density, electron temperature, and plasma potential, respectively. Comparisons with a statistical response surface model (RSM) revealed that neural network models are more accurate by an improvement of more than 25% in prediction performance. A similar level of prediction accuracy was also achieved in modeling spatial uniformity data. Consequently, neural networks demonstrated much better prediction capabilities over RSM in modeling complex equipment plasma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: