What question did this study set out to answer?

To describe the background, methodology, and processes of the UK National Audit Projects evaluating major complications in anaesthesia.

The United Kingdom National Audit Projects: a narrative review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Design

Review

Authors

May support broader adoption of national audit programs; leaves open prospective validation of sustained outcome benefits.

To describe the background, methodology, and processes of the UK National Audit Projects evaluating major complications in anaesthesia.
Narrative review examining the development and execution of the Royal College of Anaesthetists' National Audit Project programme since 2006.
Assessed registry and investigation frameworks covering central neuraxial block (NAP3), airway management (NAP4), accidental awareness (NAP5), and perioperative anaphylaxis (NAP6).
Generated comprehensive quantitative data on complication frequencies, incidence, prevalence, and associated risk factors.
Provided qualitative insights on human factors and thematic analysis, driving updated clinical recommendations and nationwide changes in practice.

Thomas et al. (2016) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark