Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce a method for imaging the earthquake source dynamics from the inversion of ground motion records based on a parallel genetic algorithm. The source model follows an elliptical patch approach and uses the staggered‐grid split‐node method to simulate the earthquake dynamics. A statistical analysis is used to estimate errors in both inverted and derived source parameters. Synthetic inversion tests reveal that the average rupture speed ( V r ), the rupture area, and the stress drop (Δ τ ) may be determined with formal errors of ~30%, ~12%, and ~10%, respectively. In contrast, derived parameters such as the radiated energy ( E r ), the radiation efficiency ( η r ), and the fracture energy ( G ) have larger errors, around ~70%, ~40%, and ~25%, respectively. We applied the method to the M w 6.5 intermediate‐depth (62 km) normal‐faulting earthquake of 11 December 2011 in Guerrero, Mexico. Inferred values of Δ τ = 29.2 ± 6.2 MPa and η r = 0.26 ± 0.1 are significantly higher and lower, respectively, than those of typical subduction thrust events. Fracture energy is large so that more than 73% of the available potential energy for the dynamic process of faulting was deposited in the focal region (i.e., G = (14.4 ± 3.5) × 10 14 J), producing a slow rupture process ( V r / V S = 0.47 ± 0.09) despite the relatively high energy radiation ( E r = (0.54 ± 0.31) × 10 15 J) and energy‐moment ratio ( E r / M 0 = 5.7 × 10 − 5 ). It is interesting to point out that such a slow and inefficient rupture along with the large stress drop in a small focal region are features also observed in both the 1994 deep Bolivian earthquake and the seismicity of the intermediate‐depth Bucaramanga nest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Díaz‐Mojica et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: