Imaging study demonstrates phase-dependent tumour–diaphragm displacement in lung and pancreatic cancers, suggesting feasibility for markerless dynamic tracking radiotherapy.
Background and Purpose : For thoracic and upper abdominal tumours, respiratory motion management is essential; dynamic tumour-tracking radiotherapy (DTT-RT) is one such approach, but it typically requires fiducial marker (FM) insertion. We evaluated intra-respiratory variation in the tumour–diaphragm geometric association and its potential as a surrogate for DTT-RT. Materials and Methods : Data from 22 patients (11 lung cancer [LC]; 11 locally advanced pancreatic cancer [LAPC]), treated with FM-based DTT-RT, were analysed. Ten-phase, four-dimensional computed tomography was used to quantify the 3D gross tumour volume (GTV)–FM displacement, 3D GTV–diaphragm displacement, and 3D GTV centroid displacement under free-breathing (FB). Phase-wise relative displacements for GTV–FM, GTV–diaphragm, and the GTV centroid under FB were calculated along the left–right (LR), anterior–posterior (AP), and superior–inferior (SI) axes as differences from the end-expiratory phase. Results : In LC, the mean 3D GTV–FM displacement, 3D GTV–diaphragm displacement, and 3D GTV centroid displacement under FB across all phases were 1.0 (range, 0–6.9), 4.6 (0.1–19.4), and 5.8 (0.1–31.8) mm, respectively ( p < 0.001). In LAPC, corresponding values were 1.6 (0.2–4.7), 4.5 (0.3–21.8), and 3.2 (0.4–17.0) mm (p < 0.001). Phase-wise relative GTV–diaphragm displacement was largest in the SI direction in LC and in the AP direction in LAPC, with patterns primarily driven by inspiratory-phase variations. Conclusions : As a surrogate, the diaphragm exhibited larger intra-respiratory variation than FMs, primarily driven by inspiratory displacements. Incorporating phase-dependent tumour–diaphragm geometry may support markerless, diaphragm-based DTT for LC and LAPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: