Why the study?
Do structural analogues of Angiotensin II differentially affect adrenal and vascular receptors in vitro?
Do structural analogues of Angiotensin II differentially affect adrenal and vascular receptors in vitro?
The study reveals functional differences between adrenal and vascular Angiotensin II receptors, suggesting the potential for designing selective therapeutic agents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform design of selective angiotensin modulators; leaves open clinical translation from this animal model.
Angiotensin II (AII) acts as both an endogenous vasoconstrictor agent and a specific trophic hormone that controls aldosterone secretion. The characteristics of vascular and adrenal receptors for AII were examined in vitro by comparing stimulation and blockade induced by two structural analogues of AII. The adrenal response was assessed on the basis of corticosterone and aldosterone production by isolated rat glomerulosa cells; isolated rabbit aortic strips provided an index of the response of vascular smooth muscle. Threshold sensitivity to AII in both tissues was 0.3-1.0 ng/ml with a peak response at about 300 ng/ml. PII3 (I-Sar-8-Ala-AII) was a competitive antagonist in both systems; 1-10 ng/ml of PII3 produced a significant parallel shift of the All dose-response curve (P < 0.01). The maximum response was not reduced; increasing doses of AII overcame the blockade, and the responses to other agonists were not influenced. PII3 did not stimulate either tissue. P 4 T 8 (4-Phe-8-Tyr-AII) was a partial agonist in the rabbit aorta; 100 ng/ml of P 4 T 8 induced competitive blockade, and contraction followed doses above 1,000 ng/ ml. Conversely, P 4 T 8 neither stimulated nor blocked the adrenal receptors, despite very high concentrations. Thus, the results of this study reveal functional differences in the All receptors in the two systems and provide an approach to designing therapeutic agents that might block only one of its two major biological effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: