Why the study?
Does topical upper airway anaesthesia modify respiratory-related evoked potentials following mid-inspiratory occlusions in healthy volunteers?
Does topical upper airway anaesthesia modify respiratory-related evoked potentials following mid-inspiratory occlusions in healthy volunteers?
Upper airway receptors sensitive to topical anaesthesia are unlikely to contribute significantly to mid-inspiratory occlusion-evoked potentials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Upper airway anaesthesia unlikely to influence occlusion-evoked potentials in healthy volunteers; leaves open receptor contributions in clinical respiratory disorders.
Cortical potentials evoked by mid-inspiratory occlusion arise from numerous receptors, many of which are probably within the upper airway. Their precise nature is not known. The aim of the current study was to improve knowledge of this by studying the effects of topical upper airway anaesthesia on respiratory-related evoked potentials. Respiratory-related evoked potentials were described through the averaging of electroencephalogram (EEG) epochs following mid-inspiratory occlusions (C3-CZ; C4-CZ). A total of 21 healthy volunteers (13 male, aged 22-52 yrs) were studied during mouth breathing, before and after topical upper airway anaesthesia (lidocaine). Moreover, 15 subjects were studied during nose breathing with and without anaesthesia. Six subjects were studied whilst inhaling L-menthol. Typical potentials were present in all the subjects, their components featuring normal amplitudes and latencies. The route of breathing and upper airway anaesthesia did not modify the EEG responses to inspiratory occlusions, qualitatively or quantitatively, during mouth or nose breathing. L-menthol had no effect. Upper airway receptors sensitive to topical anaesthesia are unlikely to contribute significantly to mid-inspiratory occlusion-evoked potentials. On the contrary, deeper receptors, such as joint and muscle receptors, could contribute dominantly to these potentials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Redolfi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: