Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
July 29, 2021International Journal of Clinical PracticeOpen Access

Outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without diabetes: A propensity score matching of the COOL‐AF registry

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

The study was conducted to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared between those with and without diabetes mellitus.

Does diabetes mellitus increase the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

Population

3402 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from 27 hospitals in Thailand

Comparison

Patients with diabetes mellitus vs without diabetes mellitus

Design

Prospective multicenter nationwide registry with propensity score matching

Follow-up

Average 25.74 ± 10.57 months

Authors

RKRungroj KrittayaphongSASuchart AroonsiriwattanaPNPornchai Ngamjanyaporn

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

DM associated with higher stroke, bleeding, and HF risks in NVAF; leaves open whether anticoagulation intensity should differ.

Structured PICO

Does diabetes mellitus increase the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
3,402 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from a prospective multicenter nationwide registry across 27 hospitals in Thailand.
I
Intervention
Presence of diabetes mellitus (DM)
C
Comparator
Absence of diabetes mellitus (propensity score matched for age, gender, comorbid conditions, and use of oral anticoagulant)
O
Outcome
Ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, and heart failure (HF) at up to 3 years follow-up, confirmed by adjudication committeehard clinical

Diabetes mellitus significantly increases the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, though the net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulation remains favorable in this high-risk group.

Cite This Study

Krittayaphong et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8415cd7e95b97f4e72f720https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14671
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share