Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relative influence of physician-assessed clinical parameters, including non-hematological adverse events and performance status, on quality of life (QOL) during chemotherapy. METHODS: QOL questionnaires consisting of four domains (functional, physical, mental and psychosocial) were self-administered every week during chemotherapy by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in two phase III clinical trials; 377 patients who completed the questionnaires at baseline and at least once during the first course of therapy were analyzed. A general linear model was applied, where the four domains and the clinical parameters (nausea/vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea, fever, peripheral neuropathy and performance status) were used as the response and explanatory variables, respectively. In this model, the multi-dimensional and longitudinal aspects of QOL data were taken into account. RESULTS: All four domains were significantly affected by the occurrence of nausea/vomiting, anorexia and diarrhea. No influence of peripheral neuropathy on the domains was detected. Performance status was significantly related to the domains (except the psychosocial domain). CONCLUSION: This study revealed, by examination of multi-dimensional repeated QOL data, that clinical parameters had significant effects on QOL in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that supportive care to control non-hematological adverse events, especially gastrointestinal, could maintain overall QOL in cancer patients in an earlier phase of chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satoshi Morita (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: