Masking Level Differences With the Grason-Stadler GSI-10 Audiometer

No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyClinical Focus: Grand Rounds1 Jul 1997Masking Level Differences With the Grason-Stadler GSI-10 Audiometer Robert F. Oyler andPhD Melissa E. St. Clair Robert F. Oyler East Tennessee State University, Department of Communicative Disorders, P.O. Box 70643, Johnson City, TN 37614-0643 Google Scholar More articles by this author and Melissa E. St. Clair Blacksburg, VA Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0602.45 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers (S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI. Google Scholar American Speech and Hearing Association. (1978). Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry.Asha, 20, 297–301. Google Scholar Arehole, S. (1995). Masking level difference in normals using Grason-Stadler audiometer (Model GSI-10).American Auditory Society Bulletin, 20(2), 101, 100. Google Scholar Grason-Stadler, Inc. (1986). Grason-Stadler GSI-10 audiometer: Instruction manual 1710-0100. Littleton, MA: Grason-Stadler. Google Scholar Hannley, M., Jerger, J. F., & Rivera, V. M. (1983). Relationship among auditory brainstem responses, masking level differences and the acoustic reflex in multiple sclerosis.Audiology, 22, 20–33. Google Scholar Harris, R. W., Brey, R. H., Miller, R. W., & Channell, R. W. (1992). Influence of masker bandwidth on binaural masking level differences.Audiology, 31, 196–204. Google Scholar Hirsh, I. J. (1948). The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 536–544. Google Scholar Jerger, J., Brown, D., & Smith, S. (1984). Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level differences.Archives of Otolaryngology, 110, 290–296. Google Scholar Licklider, J. C. R. (1948). The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 150–159. Google Scholar Lynn, G. E., Gilroy, J., Taylor, P. C., & Leiser, R. P. (1981). Binaural masking level differences in neurological disorders.Archives of Otolaryngology, 107, 357–362. Google Scholar Noffsinger, D., Martinez, C. D., & Schaefer, A. B. (1985). Puretone techniques in evaluation of central auditory function.In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of clinical audiology ( ed., pp. 337–354). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar Olsen, W. O., Noffsinger, D., & Carhart, R. (1976). Masking level differences in clinical populations.Audiology, 15, 287–301. Google Scholar Wilson, R. H., Arcos, J. T., Brown, C. J., & Bennett, L. A. (1984). Masking level difference in filtered-random and amplitude modulated noise.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 267–274. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 6Issue 2July 1997Pages: 45-48 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Jan 29, 1996Accepted: Jul 18, 1996 Published in issue: Jul 1, 1997 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesKeywordsamplitude-modulated noisemasking level differencesclinical normsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1997 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...