Key result
Middle meningeal artery embolization shows a low ~4% rate of neurological complications in chronic subdural hematoma.
Why the study?
What is the incidence of complications following middle meningeal artery embolization in patients with chronic subdural hematoma?
Meta-Analysis (n=921)
What is the incidence of complications following middle meningeal artery embolization in patients with chronic subdural hematoma?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma is a generally well-tolerated procedure with a low risk of significant complications.
BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an established treatment option for chronic subdural hematoma. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish estimates of the pooled incidence for complications following MMAE. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies reporting complications following MMAE through January 2023. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled incidence of complications stratified based on whether studies excluded patients with comorbidities. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. RESULTS: A final 34 studies containing 921 patients undergoing MMAE were included that reported 35 complications. Neurological complications were reported in 7 studies with an overall pooled incidence of 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6%-5.5%). Across these studies, there was a pooled incidence of 4.9% (95% CI: 2.9%-8.0%), 3.0% (95% CI: 1.7%-5.3%), and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.4%-9.7%) in studies that did not exclude, did not mention, or excluded patients with comorbidities, respectively. Similarly, 7 studies reported cardiovascular complications with an overall pooled incidence of 3.6% (95% CI: 2.4%-5.4%), 4 studies reported infectious complications with an overall pooled incidence of 2.9% (95% CI: 1.9%-4.5%), and 3 studies reported for miscellaneous complications with an overall pooled incidence of 3.1% (95% CI: 2.0%-4.8%). Further subgroup analysis revealed the pooled incidence of cardiovascular complications was 3.2% (95% CI: 1.7%-6.1%) in studies that did not exclude patients with comorbidities, 4.1% (95% CI: 2.3%-7.1%) in studies that did not specify the exclusion of such patients, and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.2%-11.5%) in studies that excluded these patients. Similarly, the incidence of infectious complications was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.7%-6.2%), 2.7% (95% CI: 1.5%-5.0%), and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.2%-11.5%) across these groups, respectively. Miscellaneous complications were reported at 4.0% (95% CI: 2.2%-7.2%), 2.3% (95% CI: 1.1%-4.6%), and 3.1% (95% CI: 0.9%-10.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature suggests that MMAE is a generally well-tolerated procedure with a low risk of significant complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shafi et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic subdural hematoma (n=921). Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) was evaluated on Neurological complications (95% CI 2.6-5.5). Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma had a low pooled incidence of neurological (3.8%), cardiovascular (3.6%), and infectious (2.9%) complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: