Key result
Acetylsalicylic acid did not reduce organ dysfunction compared with placebo (mean difference 0.60; 95% CI -0.55 to 1.75; p=0.30) and significantly increased the risk of severe bleeding.
Why the study?
Platelets play a critical role in inflammation and coagulation, but whether acetylsalicylic acid reduces organ dysfunction intensity in septic patients was unknown.
Does acetylsalicylic acid reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction in adults with sepsis and severe organ dysfunction?
RCT (n=166)
blinded
parallel-group
Yes
Does acetylsalicylic acid reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction in adults with sepsis and severe organ dysfunction?
Mean Difference: 0.6 (95% CI -0.55–1.75)
p-value: p=0.30
In adults with sepsis and severe organ dysfunction, acetylsalicylic acid 200 mg for 7 days did not improve organ dysfunction and significantly increased the risk of major bleeding.
Acetylsalicylic acid should be avoided in sepsis with severe organ dysfunction due to lack of benefit and increased bleeding; challenges prior observational hypotheses.
OBJECTIVES: Platelets play a critical role in the inflammatory response and coagulation. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) would reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction in septic patients. DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Five general ICUs in Brazil. PATIENTS: Adults with sepsis for no longer than 48 hours who had at least one severe organ dysfunction (lactate > 4 mmol/L, platelets < 100,000/mm3, Pao2/Fio2 ratio < 200, or septic shock). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of ASA or placebo for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 0 and day 7 or date of discharge/death. Safety outcomes were major bleeding and the number of blood transfusions within 14 days. The planned sample size was 218 with interim safety analyses after enrolling 109 and 163 patients. The study was discontinued due to higher frequency of major bleeding in the ASA group. We included 166 patients (ASA: 82 patients, placebo: 84). In the adjusted analysis, there was no difference in the SOFA change between the groups (mean placebo to ASA group difference, 0.60; 95% CI, -0.55 to 1.75; p = 0.30). There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In the intervention group, there were a higher number of serious adverse events (9 [11%] vs. 1 [1.2%]; p = 0.009) and major bleeding (8 [8.5%] vs. 1 [1.2%]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of septic patients, ASA did not reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction. ASA increased the risk of severe bleeding compared with placebo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Sepsis and septic shock (n=166). Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 0 and day 7 or date of discharge/death (MD 0.60, 95% CI -0.55 to 1.75, p=0.30). Acetylsalicylic acid did not reduce organ dysfunction compared with placebo (mean difference 0.60; 95% CI -0.55 to 1.75; p=0.30) and significantly increased the risk of severe bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: