An analysis of recent experimental data for high-performance In0.7Ga0.3As high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) for logic applications is presented. By using a fully quantum mechanical ballistic model, we simulate In0.7Ga0.3As HEMTs with gate lengths of LG= 60, 85, and 135 nm and compare the result to the measured IV characteristics, including drain-induced barrier lowering, subthreshold swing, and threshold voltage variation with gate insulator (wide-bandgap barrier layer) thickness, as well as on-current performance. To first order, devices with three different oxide thicknesses and channel lengths can all be described by a ballistic model for the channel with appropriate values of parasitic series resistance. For high gate and drain voltages ( VGS-VT=0.5 V and VDS=0.5 V), however, the ballistic simulations consistently overestimate the measured on-current (a sign of higher transconductance), and they do not show the experimentally observed decrease in on-current with increasing gate length. With no parasitic series resistance at all, the simulated on-current of the LG= 60 nm device is about twice the measured current. According to the simulation, the estimated ballistic carrier injection velocity for this device is about 2.7 times 107cm/s. Because of the importance of the semiconductor capacitance, the simulated gate capacitance is about 2.5 times less than the insulator/barrier capacitance. Possible causes of the transconductance degradation observed experimentally under high gate voltages in these devices are also explored. In addition to a possible gate-voltage-dependent scattering mechanism, the limited ability of the source to supply carriers to the channel and the effect of nonparabolicity are likely to play a role. The drop in the on-current at higher gate biases with increasing gate length, is an indication that the devices operate below the ballistic limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neophytou et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: