Key result
The Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) is being evaluated in a planned cluster-randomized controlled trial to determine its impact on optimizing stroke prevention therapy in older adults with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does the Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) improve the utilization of appropriate antithrombotic therapy and reduce adverse clinical outcomes in older patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=500)
PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does the Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) improve the utilization of appropriate antithrombotic therapy and reduce adverse clinical outcomes in older patients with atrial fibrillation?
This study protocol outlines a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate whether a computerized decision support tool can optimize antithrombotic prescribing and improve clinical outcomes in older patients with atrial fibrillation in general practice.
CARAT's impact on antithrombotic prescribing and outcomes in older AF patients remains unproven; the planned cluster-RCT will provide the first direct test.
BACKGROUND: Therapy for stroke prevention in older persons with atrial fibrillation (AF) is underutilized despite evidence to support its effectiveness. To prevent stroke in this high-risk population, antithrombotic treatment is necessary. Given the challenges and inherent risks of antithrombotic therapy, decision-making is particularly complex for clinicians, necessitating comprehensive risk:benefit assessments. Targeted interventions are urgently needed to support clinicians in this context; the Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) offers a unique approach to this clinical problem. METHODS/DESIGN: This study (a prospective, cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial) will be conducted across selected regions in the state of New South Wales, Australia. Fifty GPs will be randomized to either the 'intervention' or 'control' arm, with each GP recruiting 10 patients (aged ≥65 with AF); target sample size is 500 patients. GPs in the intervention arm will use CARAT during routine patient consultations to: assess risk factors for stroke, bleeding and medication misadventure; quantify the risk/benefit ratio of antithrombotic treatment, identify the recommended therapy, and decide on the treatment course, for an individual patient. CARAT will be applied by the GP at baseline and repeated at 12 months to identify any changes to treatment requirements. At baseline, the participant (patients and GPs) characteristics will be recorded, as well as relevant practice and clinical parameters. Patient follow up will occur at 1, 6, and 12 months via telephone interview to identify changes to therapy, medication side effects, or clinical events. DISCUSSION: This project tests the utility of a novel decision support tool (CARAT) in improving the use of preventative therapy to reduce the significant burden of stroke. Importantly, it targets the interface of patient care (general practice), addresses the at-risk population, evaluates clinical outcomes, and offers a tool that may be sustainable via integration into prescribing software and primary care services. GP support and guidance in identifying at risk patients for the appropriate selection of therapy is widely acknowledged. This trial will evaluate the impact of CARAT on the prescription of antithrombotic therapy, its longer-term impact on clinical outcomes including stroke and bleeding, and clinicians perceived utility of CARAT in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000060741.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajorek et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=500). Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Changes to antithrombotic therapy and proportion of patients experiencing adverse clinical outcomes. The Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) is being evaluated in a planned cluster-randomized controlled trial to determine its impact on optimizing stroke prevention therapy in older adults with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: