Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have previously reported highly potent basophil/mast cell (BMC) and basophil/eosinophil (Eo) colony-stimulating activities (CSA) in conditioned medium derived from cultured human nasal polyp epithelial scrapings (NP-CM). We now have examined the involvement of peripheral blood T-cells in the NP-CM stimulation of colony-forming units (cfu) from the blood of atopic and nonatopic subjects. Because the number of BMC- and Eo-cfu was significantly higher in cultures of peripheral blood from subjects with out-of-season ragweed allergic rhinitis than from control subjects (23.8 +/- 4.1 versus 9.0 +/- 2.4, p less than 0.01), we asked whether the observed colony stimulation could be a T-cell-dependent effect. Indeed, peripheral blood target cells consisting of a reconstituted mixture of T-cells and T-cell-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (non-T-cells) yielded a significantly higher number of colonies in the presence of NP-CM than the non-T-cells alone. NP-CM did not stimulate colony formation by isolated T-cells. These observations point to interactions among nasal epithelial growth and differentiation factors, blood-borne progenitors and T-cells in the local accumulation of basophils, mast cells, and eosinophils in nasal polyps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohnishi et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: