The discovery of the Rose Theatre in 1989 led to the implementation of new planning guidance focused on the presumption that the preferred response to development impacting on archaeological sites would be mitigation and preservation in situ. There was little understanding of what the impact of mitigation would be on the quality of the buried evidence and the Rose Theatre site was the first to be scientifically monitored. As a direct result research was implemented and the PARIS series of conferences were initiated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mike Corfield (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: