Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
H-2+ and H-2- cells of B16 melanoma were established by repeated fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The H-2- line formed no metastasis in untreated C57BL/6 mice, whereas the H-2+ cells showed evidence of metastatic development. This difference was ascribed mainly to the increased susceptibility of H-2- cells to attack by natural effector mechanisms, particularly asialo GM1+ NK cells. After treatment with both anti-asialo GM1 serum and whole body irradiation (400 rad), numerous colonies of H-2- cells formed in the lung, whereas the metastasis was only marginally enhanced by irradiation and moderately by treatment with anti-asialo GM1 serum. With the H-2+ cells, treatment with each modality significantly increased the number of metastatic colonies. Therefore collaboration of asialo GM1+ NK cells and radiosensitive natural effectors seems to be the main mechanism involved in the synergistic effects on defense against H-2- cell metastasis, and to a lesser extent against H-2+ cell metastasis. Irradiation (1000 rad) to the right lung to abrogate the organ-associated defense increased the colonies, particularly in the H-2+ cells. On the other hand, treatment with anti-asialo GM1 serum increased colonization in the early phase of metastasis with H-2- cells and may have abolished asialo GM1+ NK cells capable of recognizing the reduced expression of H-2 antigens and eliminating H-2- cells in the blood-born phase. Natural defense mechanisms probably exert suppressive effects on the metastasis of H-2+ cells, mainly in the organ-associated phase after extravasation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawano et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: