Key result
Targeted therapies for rare sarcomas show promising results, but generalization requires new trial designs and a softening of the corresponding regulatory framework.
Tailored therapeutic approaches based on molecular profiling are promising for rare sarcomas but require novel trial designs due to the rarity of subtypes.
Supports targeted therapies in rare sarcomas; leaves open needs for novel trial designs and regulatory flexibility.
Introduction: Based on the emergence of new molecular diagnostic tools over the past decade, sarcomas now gather a variety of rare histological and molecular subtypes. Here, the authors summarize characteristics of the rarest subtypes (<1%), and detail current and future tailored therapeutic options.Areas covered: This review outlines the current and future approaches towards the tailored therapeutic of rare sarcomas, the gaps in our knowledge and how new molecular tools can be used for drug discovery. A literature search was performed using PubMed. Recent clinical trials testing targeted therapies for sarcomas are reviewed in detail.Expert commentary: The outcome of metastatic sarcoma patients has remained poor for several decades, highlighting the need for a novel research approach. Nevertheless, this strategy remains challenging because of the rarity of each molecular subtype. Results are promising but generalization of this approach will require new trial designs and a softening of the corresponding regulatory framework. Furthermore, initiatives in obtaining tumor samples to further explore the genetic and immunological profile of sarcomas will be essential in order to further identify novel pathways and targets to exploit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gantzer et al. (2018) conducted a review in Rare sarcomas. Targeted therapies was evaluated. Targeted therapies for rare sarcomas show promising results, but generalization requires new trial designs and a softening of the corresponding regulatory framework.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: