Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tracer diffusion measurements in β‐titanium are reviewed and new data presented for solutes Sc 46 , Sn 113 , and P 32 . All Arrhenius plots are curved and give unusually low activation energies and frequency factors. Various explanations are outlined and it is suggested that monovacancy diffusion dominates but that divacancy contributions may become appreciable near the melting point. Impurity activation energies and diffusion rates are closely related to atomic size and compressibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Askill et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: