Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The adiabatic ionization potential of GeH+4 (GeH4) is measured by photoionization mass spectrometry to be ≤10.53 eV and perhaps as low as 10.44 eV. This is about 0.8 eV (∼9 vibrational quanta) lower than the value reported by photoelectron spectroscopy. This result, analogous to that found for SiH+4 (SiH4), implies a marked Jahn–Teller distortion of GeH+4. The appearance potentials of GeH+2 and GeH+3 from GeH4 are ≤10.772±0.009 eV and <11.657±0.01 eV, respectively. The reaction of F atoms with GeH4 generates GeH3, GeH2 (weakly), and some atomic germanium. The adiabatic ionization potential of GeH3 is ≤7.948±0.005 eV; that of GeH2 is ≤9.25 eV. Together with auxiliary information, limits (more probable values) of the incremental bond energies, in kcal/mol, are found to be D0 (H3Ge–H) <85.5 (82±2); D0 (H2Ge–H) >56.4 (59); D0 (HGe–H) <68.9 (66); and D0 (Ge–H) >53.7 (63). These specific bond energies, when appropriately normalized, display the same pattern as the SiHn (but not the CHn) bond energies and provide a basis for estimating the corresponding SnHn bond energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwarz et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: