Key result
Obesity emerged as a strong predictor of poor health status, significantly increasing the odds of having diseases by nearly 12-fold compared to normal weight individuals.
Why the study?
Non-communicable diseases are a growing public health challenge, requiring a comprehensive understanding of geo-demographic, socioeconomic, psychological, and lifestyle determinants to develop targeted strategies.
Cross-Sectional (n=4,010)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 11.9
p-value: p=<0.001
In a large multinational survey, BMI, psychological distress, and lifestyle factors like diet and sleep were significant predictors of self-reported health status, highlighting the need for multidomain public health interventions.
Survey links education, employment, BMI, anxiety, and lifestyle to health status; leaves open causal pathways for targeted interventions.
Background Non-communicable diseases are a growing public health challenge, shaped not only by biological predispositions but also by geo-demographic, socioeconomic, psychological, and lifestyle factors. A comprehensive understanding of these determinants is essential for developing targeted public health strategies. This study aimed to examine the multifactorial determinants of individual health status by analyzing geo-demographic, socio-economic, behavioral, psychological, and lifestyle variables. Methods Data were collected from 4,010 participants (age: 37.2 ± 15.4 years; 59.5% female) across 10 Mediterranean and neighboring countries using the multinational MEDIET4ALL e-survey. Health status was categorized as healthy, at-risk, or with diseases. Multinomial logistic regression, Quade’s Rank ANCOVA and series of multiple regression models were conducted. Results Collectively, around 25% of respondents declared to be at-risk of or with known disease. BMI emerged as the strongest negative predictor of health status ( β = −0.145), with both obesity and underweight significantly increasing the odds of being at risk (OR = 1.8 and 5.2, respectively) and having diseases (OR = 2.2 and 11.9, respectively). Other significant negative predictors included psychological distress (notably anxiety, β = −0.091), insomnia ( β = −0.084), alcohol consumption ( β = −0.053), and prolonged sitting time ( β = −0.037). Conversely, life satisfaction was the strongest significant protective factor ( β = 0.066), followed by higher education, better sleep quality, and adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and lifestyle ( β = 0.034 to 0.050). Socio-economic disparities, including employment status ( β = −0.045) and living environment ( β = −0.031), also significantly influenced health outcomes with rural environment and employed individual showing lower odd ratios of being at-risk and/or having diseases ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, individuals residing in Mediterranean regions, females, married or cohabiting individuals, and non-smokers exhibited significantly lower odds of being at-risk or having diseases ( p < 0.05). While gender remained a significant predictor in the final refined comprehensive regression model ( β = −0.049), marital status lost significance, suggesting that its protective effect may be mediated by psychological well-being and health-related behaviors. Conclusion These findings highlight the complex interplay of lifestyle, mental health, and socio-environmental factors in determining health outcomes, while emphasizing the urgent need for multi-level public health interventions, including policies promoting physical activity, healthy eating, mental well-being, and equitable healthcare access. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to establish causal relationships and guides preventive strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammar et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Health status (healthy, at-risk, or with diseases) (n=4,010). Obesity (BMI ≥30) vs. Normal weight was evaluated on Having diseases (vs healthy) (OR 11.9, p=<0.001). Obesity emerged as a strong predictor of poor health status, significantly increasing the odds of having diseases by nearly 12-fold compared to normal weight individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: