Key result
Lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid reduced delayed ischemic neurological deficit compared to standard therapy alone in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (21.0% vs 35.2%, P=0.021).
Why the study?
Does lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid reduce the prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
RCT (n=210)
randomized
No
Does lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid reduce the prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 35.2%
p-value: p=0.021
Lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reduces delayed ischemic neurological deficit and improves early clinical outcomes, but does not improve 6-month outcomes.
Supports lumbar drainage to reduce delayed ischemic neurological deficit after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; extends evidence for early benefit without 6-month outcome improvement.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A single-center prospective randomized controlled trial has been conducted to determine if lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reduces the prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit and improves clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grade 1 to 3 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and modified Fisher Grades 2, 3, 4, and 3+4 were randomized to either the study group of standard therapy plus insertion of a lumbar drain or the control group of standard therapy alone. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit. RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (166 female, 44 male; median age, 54 years; interquartile range, 45-62 years) were recruited into the control (n=105) and study (n=105) groups of the trial. World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade was: 1 (n=139), 2 (n=60), and 3 (n=11); Fisher grade was: 2 (n=87), 3 (n=85), and 4 (n=38). The prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit was 35.2% and 21.0% in the control and study groups, respectively (P=0.021). The prevalence of a modified Rankin Scale score of 4, 5, or 6 at Day 10 and 6 months, respectively, was 62.5% and 18.6% in the control group and 44.8% and 19.8% in the study group (P=0.009 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has been shown to reduce the prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit and improve early clinical outcome but failed to improve outcome at 6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00842049.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Tamimi et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=210). lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid vs. standard therapy alone was evaluated on prevalence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (p=0.021). Lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid reduced delayed ischemic neurological deficit compared to standard therapy alone in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (21.0% vs 35.2%, P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: