Key result
Perioperative brain protection strategies show experimental promise, but their translation into clinical success remains an unachieved objective.
Why the study?
What is the rationale and current evidence for perioperative brain protection strategies?
What is the rationale and current evidence for perioperative brain protection strategies?
Despite promising experimental data, active pharmacological neuroprotection and preconditioning during the perioperative period have yet to demonstrate consistent clinical success.
Does not support clinical adoption of perioperative neuroprotection; leaves open rigorous trials to achieve translation.
Perioperative brain protection refers to prophylactic measures instituted during the perioperative period to prevent or reduce ischaemic damage and to improve neurological outcome. In that context, strategies for protecting the brain rely on the control of physiological variables, anaesthesia, administration of non-anaesthetic pharmacological agents and preconditioning. Avoiding hyperthermia, hyperglycaemia and arterial hypotension are passive neuroprotective measures acknowledged in human beings. The protective effect of anaesthesia, compared to the awake state, is demonstrated in animals but remains to be validated in clinical practice. Laboratory studies investigating pharmacological neuroprotection have shown interesting results but most clinical trials have been disappointing except for a few drugs in specific settings. Preconditioning which results in the induction of some resistance to ischaemia appears as a promising strategy. Up to now, the translation of beneficial experimental results into clinical success is considered an entirely permissible hope but remains an unachieved objective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincent Bonhomme (2004) conducted a review in Perioperative ischaemic brain damage. Perioperative brain protection strategies was evaluated. Perioperative brain protection strategies show experimental promise, but their translation into clinical success remains an unachieved objective.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: