Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The most widely used method for isotope analysis at natural abundance is isotope ratio monitoring by Mass Spectrometry (irm‐MS) which provides bulk isotopic composition in 2 H, 13 C, 15 N, 18 O or 34 S. However, in the 1980s, the direct access to Site‐specific Natural Isotope Fractionation by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (SNIF‐NMR TM ) was immediately recognized as a powerful technique to authenticate the origin of natural or synthetic products. The initial – and still most popular – application consisted in detecting the chaptalization of wines by irm‐ 2 H NMR. The approach has been extended to a wide range of methodologies over the last decade, paving the way to a wide range of applications, not only in the field of authentication but also to study metabolism. In particular, the emerging irm‐ 13 C NMR approach delivers direct access to position‐specific 13 C isotope content at natural abundance. After highlighting the application scope of irm‐NMR ( 2 H and 13 C), this article describes the major improvements which made possible to reach the required accuracy of 1‰ (0.1%) in irm‐ 13 C NMR. The last part of the manuscript summarizes the different steps to perform isotope analysis as a function of the sample properties (concentration, peak overlap) and the kind of targeted isotopic information (authentication, affiliation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jézéquel et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: