Key result
The Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter had significantly fewer failures than the Nihon Kohden AY-900P during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (22.2% vs 77.8%; P=0.0022).
Why the study?
Does the Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter improve Spo2 monitoring reliability compared to a conventional pulse oximeter in patients undergoing mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass?
Observational (n=18)
Does the Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter improve Spo2 monitoring reliability compared to a conventional pulse oximeter in patients undergoing mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass?
The Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter provides significantly more reliable and continuous Spo2 monitoring than a conventional device during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with nonpulsatile flow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Masimo SET was associated with fewer SpO2 failures during mild hypothermic CPB; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Newly developed pulse oximeters (POs) are designed to display accurate Spo2 during motion and hypoperfusion. We compared the performance of a new PO, the Masimo SET Radical (M), with a conventional PO, the Nihon Kohden AY-900P (N), during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Eighteen patients were studied prospectively. PO failure was defined as failure to show no Spo2 value or show incorrect Spo2 values for longer than 3 min continuously. PO failure occurred in 4 and 14 patients with M and N, respectively (P = 0.0022). All 4 patients in whom PO failure developed with M were among the 14 patients with N. No Spo2 was provided for 4% ± 12% of the duration of aorta cross-clamping with M and 36% ± 39% with N (P = 0.002). Skin temperature and mean arterial blood pressure when PO failure started to occur and ended were similar between M and N. PO failure easily developed in patients with preoperative diuretic therapy or with intraoperative hyperlactatemia in N, but not in M. M was able to display accurate Spo2 values significantly more frequently and longer than N during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with nonpulsatile flow, suggesting that M is more useful for monitoring Spo2 during hypoperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irita et al. (2003) conducted an observational in mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (n=18). Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter vs. Nihon Kohden AY-900P pulse oximeter was evaluated on Pulse oximeter failure (failure to show SpO2 value or show incorrect SpO2 values for >3 min continuously) (p=0.0022). The Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter had significantly fewer failures than the Nihon Kohden AY-900P during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (22.2% vs 77.8%; P=0.0022).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: