Key result
Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention offers opportunities for tele-stroke models of care and continues to advance across surgical and endovascular fields.
Why the study?
Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest for tele-stroke models of care in remote underserved areas, driven by the growth of robotic surgery and telemedicine.
This review provides an overview of robotic assistance in neuroendovascular interventions, drawing on lessons from interventional cardiology and other fields.
Robotic neurovascular assistance should not yet change practice; leaves open tele-stroke feasibility for prospective trials.
The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narsinh et al. (2021) conducted a review in Neurovascular intervention. Robotic assistance was evaluated. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention offers opportunities for tele-stroke models of care and continues to advance across surgical and endovascular fields.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: