Key result
Multimodal interventions successfully reduced preoperative fasting times without significant differences in gastric fluid volume or pH, indicating safety and improved patient well-being.
Why the study?
Despite guidelines recommending shorter fasting, patients fast for unnecessarily prolonged periods prior to surgery due to beliefs regarding aspiration risk upon anaesthesia induction.
Do interventions aimed at reducing preoperative fasting times safely reduce fasting duration and improve outcomes in acutely ill hospital patients?
Systematic Review (n=16)
Do interventions aimed at reducing preoperative fasting times safely reduce fasting duration and improve outcomes in acutely ill hospital patients?
Reducing preoperative fasting times in acutely ill patients is safe, does not increase aspiration risk, and improves patient well-being, supporting adherence to current fasting guidelines.
Supports shortening preoperative fasting via multimodal protocols; confirms safety and guideline adherence for improved well-being.
Despite current guidelines recommending fasting from solids for ≤6 hours and clear fluids for ≤2 hours prior to surgery, outdated practices endure; patients fast for unnecessarily prolonged periods because of beliefs regarding aspiration risk upon anaesthesia induction. This literature review aimed to identify and evaluate current interventions aiming to reduce preoperative fasting times for acutely ill hospital patients, summarizing effective interventional strategies and associated outcomes. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, and CINAHL were systematically searched. Quality of evidence was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. Studies, of any type, reporting fasting times as a primary or secondary outcome were included. A total of 1918 potential studies were identified; of these, 16 studies were included. Seven studies investigated the effect of changing fasting protocol on gastric fluid volume/residual gastric volume (GFV/RGV) and gastric pH as surrogate measures for aspiration risk. No significant differences in GFV/RGV and gastric pH due to reduced preoperative fasting were reported, thus no change in aspiration risk. Eight studies documented improvements in patient-reported outcomes with shorter fasting times. However, this review identified a paucity of studies that trialled interventions to reduce fasting times as the primary aim. These interventions were multimodal and multidisciplinary in nature, incorporating principles of implementation science to successfully achieve significant reductions in fasting times. This review highlights that reducing the preoperative fasting period is safe while improving patient's physical and psychological well-being. Further high-quality studies that investigate multimodal interventions, and that utilize implementation science principles, are required in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yip et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Acutely ill hospital patients requiring surgery (n=16). Multimodal interventions to reduce preoperative fasting times vs. Standard fasting protocols was evaluated on Fasting times, gastric fluid volume/residual gastric volume (GFV/RGV), and gastric pH. Multimodal interventions successfully reduced preoperative fasting times without significant differences in gastric fluid volume or pH, indicating safety and improved patient well-being.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: