Key result
Subarachnoid block was associated with significantly higher perioperative noradrenaline use (p<0.001) and longer length of stay (p<0.001) compared to continuous lumbar epidural and lumbosacral plexus blocks in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures.
Why the study?
Although subarachnoid block is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for femur fracture fixation, alternative techniques like continuous lumbar epidural and lumbosacral plexus blocks are also used, and their hemodynamic implications and outcomes require evaluation.
Does continuous lumbar epidural or lumbosacral plexus block improve hemodynamic stability and reduce length of stay compared to subarachnoid block in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures?
Observational (n=114)
No
Does continuous lumbar epidural or lumbosacral plexus block improve hemodynamic stability and reduce length of stay compared to subarachnoid block in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures?
In elderly patients with multiple comorbidities undergoing proximal femur fracture surgery, continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia provides better hemodynamic stability and shorter hospital stays compared to subarachnoid block.
SAB was associated with more vasopressors and longer stay; hypothesis-generating for optimal blocks in comorbid elderly femur fracture patients.
Background Although subarachnoid block (SAB) is the most popular regional anesthesia (RA) technique for fixation of femur fractures, continuous lumbar epidural (CLE) anesthesia, and lumbosacral plexus blocks (LSPB) are also employed in specific situations. The choice of RA technique depends on either the choice of the anesthesiologist or based on the underlying comorbidities. At our institute, we anesthetize elderly patients who come for fixation of femur fracture with multiple comorbidities using RA techniques as mentioned based on comorbidities and overall general condition. Methods In a cohort of 184 elderly patients, we analyzed RA techniques employed over a period of five years in elderly patients admitted with fractures of the proximal femur, its hemodynamic implications and thus attempted to find the suitable RA technique with minimal adverse events after ethics committee approval. We also compared the length of stay in the hospital in relation to RA techniques. Results The demographic data was comparable with no significant difference in administering the three RA techniques. SAB, CLE and LSPB was implemented at 33.33%, 35.96%, and 30.7% respectively. Perioperative noradrenaline infusion was a feature in patients who received SAB (p<0/001). The higher number of CLE and LSPB patients had a length of stay of fewer than 48 hours whereas most SAB patients had a length of stay of more than 48 hrs (p<0.001). Conclusion Elderly patients with multiple comorbidities should be offered CLE instead of SAB so as to maintain stable hemodynamics. RA technique in an elderly patient with multiple comorbidities should be standardized so as to provide uneventful surgical anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diwan et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Proximal femur fracture (n=114). Subarachnoid block (SAB) vs. Continuous lumbar epidural (CLE) and lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) was evaluated on Perioperative noradrenaline infusion requirement (p=<0.001). Subarachnoid block was associated with significantly higher perioperative noradrenaline use (p<0.001) and longer length of stay (p<0.001) compared to continuous lumbar epidural and lumbosacral plexus blocks in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: