Why the study?
Does nifedipine prevent thrombosis compared to verapamil in rodent models?
Does nifedipine prevent thrombosis compared to verapamil in rodent models?
Nifedipine, but not verapamil, demonstrates in vivo antithrombotic and antiplatelet effects in rodent models of thrombosis.
Nifedipine may exert antithrombotic effects absent with verapamil in rodents; leaves open translation to human thrombosis prevention.
Calcium blockers and calmodulin antagonists have been reported to inhibit the aggregation of blood platelets in vitro. In the present study, the effects of two calcium blockers, verapamil and nifedipine, were compared in several rodent thrombosis models. In rat and mouse platelet-rich plasma, preincubation with either verapamil or nifedipine had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on collagen-induced aggregation (P less than 0.01). The concentration required for 50% inhibition of rat platelet aggregation was 0.91 X 10(-4) M for verapamil and 1.77 X 10(-4) M for nifedipine. In in vivo thrombosis models in mice, acute pretreatment with nifedipine had a significant, dose-dependent protective effect (P less than 0.05). At a dose of 500 micrograms/kg, nifedipine inhibited thrombotic sudden death provoked by arachidonic acid, a thromboxane agonist (U46619), or a combination of collagen and epinephrine. In vivo platelet depletion induced by U46619 was also inhibited by this calcium blocker. Thus, nifedipine is protective against a variety of thrombotic stimuli, and its antiplatelet aggregatory effect apparently extends to the in vivo situation. In contrast, no in vivo antithrombotic activity was observed for verapamil. Two additional calcium blockers, perhexilene and diltiazem, and three calmodulin antagonists, W-7, chlorpromazine, and trifluoperazine, were also tested in the U46619-induced thrombotic sudden death model. Of these, only diltiazem (5 and 10 mg/kg) had an acute protective effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myers et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: