Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examine validation of computational electromagnetic (CEM) codes through the lens of the Electromagnetic Code Consortium (EMCC), a group of U.S. government and associated CEM practitioners that was active from the 1980s through the 2010s. Available EMCC validation cases are summarized, and several practical validation challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations are provided. Finally, one of the original EMCC cases, the metallic “business card,” is revisited to illustrate some challenges of matching modeled and measured results and their possible resolution. An integrated team-based approach to constructing validation cases and diagnosing discrepancies between modeled and measured data is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dault et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: