Key result
Tolvaptan significantly increased daily urine volume compared to carperitide in acute decompensated heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (P < 0.05) and in those with low blood pressure.
Why the study?
Does tolvaptan improve daily urine volume compared to carperitide in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
RCT (n=109)
Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does tolvaptan improve daily urine volume compared to carperitide in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 2284% vs 1763%
p-value: p=<0.05
Tolvaptan is more effective than carperitide at increasing urine volume in acute decompensated heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and low blood pressure.
Tolvaptan may be preferred for diuresis in ADHF with HFrEF or hypotension; extends RCT evidence versus carperitide but requires hard-outcome confirmation.
Diuresis is a major therapy for the reduction of congestive symptoms in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. Carperitide has natriuretic and vasodilatory effects, and tolvaptan produces water excretion without electrolyte excretion. We previously reported the usefulness of tolvaptan compared to carperitide in ADHF patients with fluid volume retention. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the efficacy of tolvaptan was altered in ADHF patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function and in those with hypotension. A total of 109 hospitalized ADHF patients were randomly assigned to either a tolvaptan or a carperitide treatment group. Baseline clinical characteristics were not different between the two groups. We divided these patients based on the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) by echocardiography, and blood pressure (BP) at the time of admission. Daily urine volume between the tolvaptan and carperitide groups in patients with preserved EF (≥ 50%) was not different, however, in those with reduced EF (< 50%), the urine volume was significantly higher in the tolvaptan group than in the carperitide group (day 2, 3, 4, P < 0.05 for all). Daily urine volume did not differ between these two groups in the high blood pressure group (BP ≥ 140 mmHg), but was significantly higher in the tolvaptan group than in the carperitide group (day 1, P = 0.021; day 3, P = 0.017) in the low blood pressure group (BP < 140 mmHg). The present study reveals that tolvaptan is more effective than carperitide, especially in ADHF patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function and without hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF) (n=109). Tolvaptan vs. Carperitide was evaluated on Increase in daily urine volume (Day 2 in HFrEF subgroup) (p=<0.05). Tolvaptan significantly increased daily urine volume compared to carperitide in acute decompensated heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (P < 0.05) and in those with low blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: